Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 18

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to {{quote box}} and {{image frame}}. I replaced it in about five articles. Frietjes (talk) 17:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge {{Aligarh}} into {{Aligarh Muslim University}}. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Aligarh with Template:Aligarh Muslim University.
Redundant to have two templates for one and the same university. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 04:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per past precedent displayed multiple times (as illustrated here), this template is unneeded because categories can better handle the need and the template pollutes the What Links Here function in the articles included. Dough4872 02:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).