Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 13

< March 12	March 14 >

March 13

Template:Diplomatic missions in Somalia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Diplomatic missions in Somalia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A navbox with only one link (WP:NAVBOX). AHeneen (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator's rationale. Navboxes exist to provide an easy means for readers to navigate among links to related topics. One link doesn't cut it. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please see: Category:Foreign relations templates. --►Cekli 829 11:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:College Home Run Derby champions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:College Home Run Derby champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not everything needs a navbox. This one only has one blue link, so there's nothing to navigate to or from. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Four out of five primary links in this template are to non-existent articles, thus violating the fundamental principle of navboxes: they exist to facilitate reader navigation among existing Wikipedia articles. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dirtlawyer1's reasoning.--Yankees10 00:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per those above. This may be worth a list if notable. Rlendog (talk) 13:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As with the other four Online Film Critics Society Award navboxes; see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 24#Template:Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor. Alakzi (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nominator's rationale and recent precedent regarding closely related templates. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ancient Roman monuments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ancient Roman monuments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unused. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:49, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Neutrality^talk 18:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anarchopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anarchopedia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Analytical chemistry journals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Analytical chemistry journals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Amrita Keerti Puraskar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 21. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Alpineskiing2010WOG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alpineskiing2010WOG (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Allahabad topics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Allahabad topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Allahabad Topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Allahabad topics with Template:Allahabad Topics.
Same template but used in different places. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These are identical; just redirect the newest one to the other. Alakzi (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Template:Allahabad Topics is actually not used anywhere; delete it. Alakzi (talk) 14:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect "Allahbad Topics" to "Allahbad topics" per Alakzi's comment above. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Air Force installations in the Continental US

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Air Force installations in the Continental US (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - @Ricky81682: This template was apparently created to complement those templates for USAF installations in Europe and Asia as currently used in the List of United States Air Force installations article. While the use of a template format may not be the best way to create and use such images, this image, as an image file or otherwise, should be converted and added to the foregoing article. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine to substitute it to me. It's not being used there now so wherever it belongs. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricky81682: Ricky, I've inserted the template into the list article identified above as a temporary expedient and placeholder. The subject template is actually a composite of a couple dozen transclusions of Template:Location map, and someone who is more deft with wiki template coding than myself will have to handle the substitution into the article so that it is done properly. You have my "delete" vote contingent on that being accomplished before or after this TfD discussion is closed. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Advertisment Conflict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Advertisment Conflict (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. I don't think it's necessary. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Adjectivals and demonyms for Philippine provinces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adjectivals and demonyms for Philippine provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template that is probably better as a page like List of adjectival and demonymic forms for countries and nations or something. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dark Gaia Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dark Gaia Studios (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 02:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not of much use. Bfpage |leave a message 22:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Regional roads navboxen in Georgia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Athens, Georgia highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Augusta, Georgia highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Columbus, Georgia highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Macon, Georgia highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Savannah, Georgia highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The purpose these templates currently serve is better served by categories. Using navboxes adds unneeded clutter. See precedents at WP:USRD/P#Other debates and a couple TfDs that have already closed for similar templates that served the Valdosta, Georgia, and Lubbock, Texas, regions, as well as a discussion about a similar group of templates in the state of Arkansas that uses these precedents. T C N7JM 01:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Valdosta precedent. V C 01:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per previous discussions. Dough 48 72 01:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As 1., the originator of these templates, and 2., a concerned editor, I think these boxes have visual value to the casual reader. When the boxes are collapsed, they don't take up much room. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 01:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above and past discussions. --Rs chen 7754 04:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—per precedent. The categories in the article are already by county, and metro areas in the US are defined by county, so these duplicate the by-county transportation categories. Imzadi 1979 → 06:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination rationale as well as recent precedents. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2013 in Sports - May

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2013 in Sports - May (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 00:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Not needed even though I stated it

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONCACAF Fourth Round Group A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONCACAF Fourth Round Group A (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 00:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2012–13 Pro 12 League Table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2012–13 Pro 12 League Table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 00:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.