Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 July 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 8

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteOpabinia regalis (talk) 04:59, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template Ricky81682 (talk) 10:11, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete (precedent, and redundancy). Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template Ricky81682 (talk) 10:06, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a consensus or something that just hasn't happened before? Because if we can keep category of this sort and a list of this sort, template also seems fine. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep on the provision that it is converted into a simple navbox. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 10:44, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template Ricky81682 (talk) 10:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the maintanance. I am adding the template into those astronomical institutions in Taiwan so it won't be orphaned template anymore. --Liang (WMTW) (talk) 11:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's still not a particular good template. It'd be better as text than a hotlinked map. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirectOpabinia regalis (talk) 05:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template. Current usage is of Template:Anna University's Campuses. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — Earwig talk 20:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just two links. ...William 10:02, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — Earwig talk 21:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template. Possibly useful as a way to consolidate the templates at Anne Frank: Template:Cultural depictions of Anne Frank and Template:Secret Annex. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:59, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Samwalton9 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template test I think. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:56, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MER-C 12:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating this navigation template for deletion as I have nominated the entire group of articles associated with this template (related to a non notable award mill) for deletion. The deletion of those articles would deprecate this template. Safiel (talk) 04:50, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.