Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 21
Appearance
January 21
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unneeded for navigation. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Friendly association football tournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Non-notable friendly tournaments JMHamo (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence of notability, see previous consensus in March 2013 and June 2013 and September 2014. GiantSnowman 18:35, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NENAN, and the only three articles with blue links are all undergoing AfD. — Jkudlick tcs 09:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per the Snowman's rationale above. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unusable for navigation. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Navbox that doesn't navigate to any relevant articles. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A navbox with all redlinks can be useful if the subjects are notable (e.g. for a related group of people who pass WP:POLITICIAN), but in this case, we don't know if any of the camps are notable. Restore if WP:GNG-proven articles are written about two or more of the camps. Nyttend (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as premature per Nyttend —PC-XT+ 08:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per Nyttend. No useable links for the listed summer camps, no evidence of notability of the subject, and the absence of a stand-alone list or article to support this navbox. Three strikes, and out. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.