Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 17
August 17
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Boldly redirected, per WP:SNOW. Any differences in content or presentation can be resolved on the target template's talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox Jainism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This is not the correct use of an infobox; it is being used by ONE page to (badly) replicate Template:Jainism Ogress smash! 20:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Subst and delete per nom -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Alakzi (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
A rather extreme case of WP:NENAN, this navbox has literally one article (or two if you count Twelfth Doctor in the title). NYKevin 19:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - There will be more eventually... Every incarnation started out this way.
-- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}}21:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)- NOTE that the template is also included inside {{Doctor Who companions}}, so while on it's own it may seem redundant, it is part of a bigger whole.
-- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}}17:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)- @Edokter: Why can't you just subst it there? --NYKevin 19:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Makes it harder to maintain.
-- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}}19:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Makes it harder to maintain.
- @Edokter: Why can't you just subst it there? --NYKevin 19:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- NOTE that the template is also included inside {{Doctor Who companions}}, so while on it's own it may seem redundant, it is part of a bigger whole.
- Delete. Useless as-is; let it be recreated once there are enough entries to make the navbox realistically useful for navigation. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough links to provide useful navigation. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Alex|The|Whovian 08:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:2013 Samsung Lions
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Alakzi (talk) 14:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Template:2013 Samsung Lions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2012 Samsung Lions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unnecessary, redundant, and minor. 2013 Korean Series#Roster is sufficient. Sawol (talk) 16:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- weak delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 16:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.