Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 1

< January 31	February 2 >

February 1

Template:Banburyshire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Banburyshire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not an area with any defined boundaries, more of a concept. It is only somebody's opinion whether many outlying places are in or outside the area. Delete as original research. Charles (talk) 10:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it's primarily a publicity concept with no legal foundation; the only source that uses the term "Banburyshire" to any great extent is the Banbury Guardian, and then only in touristy articles - they don't use the term in serious news reports. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I do wonder if the subject would be better redirected and merged to Banbury. It is only in the lead section there at present.--Charles (talk) 18:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.