Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 14

< May 13	May 15 >

May 14

Template:Interwiki-all

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Interwiki-all (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant as a result of Wikidata's collection of interwiki links. Frigid Ninja 20:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, it appears this is no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mark historical for the history of Wikipedia, indicating the existing sister languages at the time Wikidata took over -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 05:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This isn't an archeological dig site. We don't need to preserve broken old templates as if they're Norse arrowheads. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - It makes it harder for latter-day digital archaeologists and historians to do things if we do not keep in mind the historic character of Wikipedia. We ourselves (as wikipedians) already complain when our online sources die, so we should bear in mind such things about the character of Wikipedia itself as it concerns to academics studying the history of the internet. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:43, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Latter-day archaelogists would still be perfectly able to access this in the database dump, which is the original manuscript as far as we're concerned. We needn't keep it around here undeleted. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WMC years

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WMC years (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Red-linked template with no attempt to create articles for the missing years. Standard article wikilinking is sufficient here until articles for individual years are created. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 20:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hollywood Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hollywood Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The lists of former and current artists of the record label should suffice and this template is not needed. Links to other artists that have no distinct relationship to one another beyond sharing a label is no need for a navigational box. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, a category would do fine here if such a grouping is needed at all. Frietjes (talk) 20:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:A Hope for Home

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A Hope for Home (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Only links to two albums and the band's label. No additional aid in navigation. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 14:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not enough primary links. Frietjes (talk) 20:47, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Field hockey at the 2012 Summer Olympics tournament navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Field hockey at the 2012 Summer Olympics tournament navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template directs to subsections on the pages Men's tournament and Women's tournament. It's not necessary to keep the template for these two pages, because they're on Template:FieldHockeyAt2012SummerOlympics. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 13:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ambivalent: I suppose the intention was to have the various stages of the tournaments in separate, more detailed articles, just like Template:Football at the 2012 Summer Olympics tournament navbox, but I guess it has never materialized.

HandsomeFella (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Duplicative. Capitalismojo (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not enough primary links. Frietjes (talk) 20:48, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with rationale Rankersbo (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.