Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 March 20

< March 19	March 21 >

March 20

Template:Infobox yeshiva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox yeshiva (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox university}} (which is also used for non-university colleges). Only 16 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment, looks like a fork of {{infobox school}} in appearance. I would say, at the very least, refactor it to call that template. Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Replace and delete; no point in keeping it. Nyttend (talk) 02:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox HRM Community Neighbourhood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox HRM Community Neighbourhood (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary wrapper for wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}.. Only 44 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:20, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete after substitution/replacement. Frietjes (talk) 22:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox societies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox societies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox organisation}}. Only 20 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete after replacement. Frietjes (talk) 22:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
replace and then redirect replace uses with {{infobox organization}} and then redirect to it. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 04:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hist ast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hist ast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Virtually the identical to this version of ast box: [1] except with a different image. I've replaced it in History of Astrology with ast box. I've also added the image here to the article. Thus it is redundant. Note that I have not informed the creator as she/he is topic banned. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jewish date

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by CactusWriter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:06, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jewish date (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template (created by myself) was found to be redundant to the parser function #time. Ypnypn (talk) 18:07, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Frietjes (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jetix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jetix (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I just deleted most of the content of the template in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jetix (US), everything else doesn't seem extremely relevant for the subject like the list of Europe shows of the deleted content. Secret ^account 04:24, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Jetix Animation Concepts and Original Jetix Magazine are now redirects to Jetix section on them as they were primarily unsourced information. Jetix Europe co-productions have been copied out of the template to List of programs broadcast by Jetix. Remaining template links are in the article already or can be move to a see also section. --Spshu (talk) 19:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with Spshu (talk · contribs). JJ98 (Talk) 06:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
i don't think there will be need to delete the article as the majority of its users are well informed and in search of those nitty gritty additional issues we cant get from the voluminous and tirring text books — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.49.88.102 (talk) 08:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 13:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Discussion of Template:Sidebar subsection & 2 others has been relisted at April 8

In case anyone else is otherwise puzzled (as I was), discussion of Template:Sidebar subsection & 2 others has been relisted from here (March 20) to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 April 8. The last Edit summary here was mine:

Improving functionality of sidebars, as suggested above, seems very worthwhile [& feasible now....Any simpler future alternative to current Template:Sidebar subsection seems un-problematic.] --Thomasmeeks (talk) 11:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]