Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 January 14

< January 13	January 15 >

January 14

Template:NHL Number One Draft Picks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NHL Number One Draft Picks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

per previous template discussions this should be replaced by a succession box. —KRM ^{(Communicate!)} 23:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per much previous consensus that number one draft picks in hockey should be handled by succession boxes. -DJSasso (talk) 12:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NENAN. Reso lute 14:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A navbox works better than a succession box for items like this, because it allows navigation other than to just the immediate predecessor or successor. Rlendog (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not really I forget the exact link. It may be in WP:NAVBOX but there is guidance that positions/awards should use succession boxes instead of navboxes. I would say something like this is the equivalent to an award or a position in that only one person has it at a time. If people want the entire list you click on the list article in the succession box. -DJSasso (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, after replacing with a succession box, and if you want to see the whole list, you just click on List of first overall NHL draft picks in the succession box. Frietjes (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe this has already been replaced with a succession box in looking at a few of the pages it is on. I believe this a recreation of one earlier deleted but I am not positive what it had been called last time so I couldn't find an archive. -DJSasso (talk) 15:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
you are looking for Template:NHL FirstOverallDraftPicks. Frietjes (talk) 17:53, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 17:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bee Gees compilations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bee Gees compilations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Bee Gees}}. Very few of the albums in this list have articles useful for navigation and those that do are linkable through the main template. The full list of comps should be added to Bee Gees discography#Compilation albums not in a navbox. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This merely a list of songs with minimal navigation. Should be detailed in discography. Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the notable compilations are on or should be added to {{Bee Gees}}, the rest don't need to be in a navbox. Rlendog (talk) 14:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Animal list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Animal list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

doesn't save much to use it, and lacks the flexibility of using standard table markup. also, the name should be "Korean species list" or something else. Frietjes (talk) 20:11, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Metal Hammer Albums of the Year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Metal Hammer Albums of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A lot of music magazines come out with a "best of" the year lists and we don't need a template for each one. Barely a mention of this distinction in well over half the articles in which the template is transcluded. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not notable. Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Czech Cabinets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Czech Cabinets (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to the older Template:Cabinets of the Czech Republic, not employed in a useful fashion. C 679 11:17, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.