Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 4
< February 3 | February 5 > |
---|
February 4
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Tween Stars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Turkey football notable former players (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Turkey football squad start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused fork of {{nat fs g start}}. Frietjes (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - do not need country-specific templates. GiantSnowman 14:56, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:TumahHierarchy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused succession box. Frietjes (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Tristan Park (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
all red links. Frietjes (talk) 19:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
unused.Frietjes (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
unused infobox test. Frietjes (talk) 19:48, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- As maker and only editor of the template, no objection to removal: it was a testing of edits to another template. Kevin McE (talk) 20:22, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Transportation on Hudson Waterfront and Palisades (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Transport in North America (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Transportation in North America (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused with articles using a broader scope template. Frietjes (talk) 19:42, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
unused and generally redundant to {{Rail Stations in İzmir}}. Frietjes (talk) 19:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
unused navbox wrapper. Frietjes (talk) 19:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:St (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
this is basically just a recreation of {{span}} which has been deleted twice (most recent 2012 October 27). the current usage of this template is generally redundant to either (a) <span style=float:right> in DYK noms, or (b) {{plainlinks}}. in the cases that it has been used in articles, it has been used for this horrid idea, which wraps the entire contents in a big plainlinks div-tag for no reason. there are also incorrect uses since editors think that 1{{st}} is the way to write 1st, since there is a similar method on the fr wikipedia. Frietjes (talk) 18:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- delete It also has a parameter to change it to use
<div>
; {{div}} was also deleted. When I went through {{span}} and {{div}} I found every use was either unneeded or could be replaced by a better template. Also edundant to {{plain link}}. --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 11:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC) - No argument here.—My76Strat • talk • email 01:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Redundant to items already listed in Template:Ziff Davis ViperSnake151 Talk 17:54, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
only used in one article, the affiliates can be handled with a see also section. Frietjes (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
almost entirely section links. could be trimmed, but that would leave only about two items, under the main title, which can be handled by a see also section. Frietjes (talk) 17:04, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.