Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 1
< January 31 | February 2 > |
---|
February 1
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Superseded by Template:1. Gambrinus liga. C679 19:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Superseded by Template:1. Gambrinus liga. C679 19:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
mostly redlinks. Frietjes (talk) 19:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Ddot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Dedab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused and generally redundant to {{title without disambig}}. Frietjes (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:DP-ship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:DMCC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:DMCT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused, uncategorized, and no documentation indicating purpose. Frietjes (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Div block (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- delete If you need a
<div>
in a template, just use one. It makes it no simpler to use. --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 17:48, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Discussion End (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
old, unused, and replaced by newer methods for closing discussions. Frietjes (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Balaenopteridae taxonomy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
replaced by taxobox. Frietjes (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Balaenidae taxonomy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Balaena taxonomy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Eubalaena taxonomy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
replaced by taxobox. Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Template:EINECSRow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
trivial image markup. should be substituted into its existing transclusions. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- delete, after substitution. Frietjes (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- keep; it's useful let the caption be updated easily by modifying just one file. Does transclusion incur any performance loss? cmɢʟee୯ ͡° ̮د ͡° ੭ 19:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The caption ("Comparison of various optical storage media") is a trivial description of the contents, and it does not negatively affect the project if it gets out of sync on different articles. Editors should not be expected to learn the intricacies of template transclusion should they wish to update such a caption on one of the transclusions. This applies generally; it is not typically advantageous to wrap images in templates unless they are either very widely deployed (significantly more than a handful of articles) or are accompanied by significant code (such as map labels) which would best be kept in one place. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Just include the image. No need for a template for every image, and especially not for this one, where the caption isn't likely to change. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:06, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.