Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 23

< August 22	August 24 >

August 23

Template:Infobox sovereign of Vatican

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox sovereign of Vatican (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template for only one article. TBrandley (T • C • B) 20:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as being redundant to better detail in that section of the article. It really does nothing. Sw2nd (talk) 00:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Halo 3 versions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Halo 3 versions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Subst and delete this template is used in only one article, and should only be used in one article, Halo 3. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:54, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom -- 1 page usage. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete Not useful anywhere else, nor will it ever likely be. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Random Access Memories track listing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Random Access Memories track listing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Similar templates have also been delated. They serve no purpose and are redundant on the basis that links are already contained at {{Daft Punk}}. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 01:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Redundant navigation. Holiday56 (talk) 03:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If I'm looking at the article for "Lose Yourself to Dance", why would I care that "Motherboard" is the 10th track on Random Access Memories? If I did care, I would just go to the album article to view the full track list anyway. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 04:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 21:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.