Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 October 19

< October 18	October 20 >

October 19

Template:Atlantic Soccer Conference navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlantic Soccer Conference navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another defunct conference; all these teams are now in other conferences. This template has a redirect that should be deleted as well. Precedent for deleting these types of templates here and here. Dafoeberezin3494 (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. NapHit (talk) 17:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

CanLII citation templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. No objections raised, and already orphaned. Anomie ⚔ 02:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canlii-fc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Canlii-fca (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Canlii-scc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Citation-scc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I have created {{cite CanLII}} which combines the functionality of all three templates (Citation-scc is a redirect to Canlii-scc), and is in line with the related templates {{cite BAILII}}, {{cite CommonLII}}, {{cite SAFLII}} and {{cite WorldLII}}. (If deletion is warranted, we will need to replace all occurrences of these citation templates with {{cite CanLII}} before deleting the earlier-mentioned templates.) — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's really good to hear! Can {{cite CanLII}} be used to reference decisions in the provincial superior and appeal courts that are also available on Canlii?Raellerby (talk) 21:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Leave a message at "Template talk:Cite CanLII" stating what the "source codes" for the courts are, and whether there are Wikipedia articles about those courts. — SMUconlaw (talk) 02:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, all uses of Canlii-fc, Canlii-fca and Canlii-scc have been replaced, following a request at the AWB noticeboard. — SMUconlaw (talk) 12:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, now orphaned, and superseded. Frietjes (talk) 20:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Italy political coalition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Italy political coalition (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now unused (I replaced it in Social Alternative) and inferior to {{infobox political coalition}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Osamu Kaneda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Osamu Kaneda (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

While such navboxes are normal, the English Wikipedia does not even have an article on this one Japanese director so this is highly unnecessary. —Ryulong (琉竜) 10:59, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep we have articles on the films, so this would constitute a valid navigation between films -- 70.24.247.66 (talk) 04:57, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
keep, this is the standard for film articles. navigate by director. Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox mtgblock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by WereSpielChequers (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox mtgblock (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Long-abandoned, unused and in-universe infobox for material which probably shouldn't have standalone articles anyway. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These articles are about real-world products, not in-universe content, but yeah, they're so thin that it seems silly not to group them into larger chunks. This infobox was part of my campaign to consolidate by release year, but I haven't been able to dedicate the time to the task. I've copied the code to my sandbox, so you've got my blessing to rinse this away. jameslucas (" " / +) 11:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Disney moderate infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disney moderate infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Disney deluxe infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Disney DVC infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: a while ago I merged these infoboxes into a single infobox, Template:Infobox Disney resort. There is no need for any of these now. Themeparkgc Talk 23:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox casino/Template:Infobox resort

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, per G7. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox casino/Template:Infobox resort (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox casino/Template:Infobox resort-casino (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox casino/Template:Infobox resort-convention center (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Long-abandoned and unused sandboxes. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, a forgotten project. No objection to deletion with no additional discussion. If I get the time to get back to this, I can recreate. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.