Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 8
May 8
[edit]Taylor Swift album templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Fearless (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Speak Now (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
More of these album templates that keep getting created despite precedent and redundancy. In these cases, linkable items here are already in the {{Taylor Swift}} and {{Taylor Swift singles}} navigational boxes. Other links seem only to be tangentially related or not even needed. If you started putting these album templates on a producer's article for every album produced, it would end up being template spam and similar to reason why there aren't actor filmography navboxes. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:08, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- delete as redundant to {{Taylor Swift}} and {{Taylor Swift singles}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete These album templates are redundant to both {{Taylor Swift}} and {{Taylor Swift singles}}. Aspects (talk) 00:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Luca Hänni (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Two directly related links, the artist and a debut single, and a red-linked album. Even if/when the album article is created, it's still not yet enough for a navbox when you can navigate back and forth from those in each article already. WP:NENAN. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- delete, not enough there for a navigation box. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Parishes under the Archdiocese of Zamboanga (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Navigates nothing; unlikely to be used at all. Xeltran (talk) 14:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- delete as redundant to Archdiocese of Zamboanga#Parishes under the Archdiocese of Zamboanga. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:12, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Unpopulated template. Used to navigate a football tournament between journalists, in which all the teams were speedy deleted, and the tournament is proposed for deletion. Serves no useful purpose. kelapstick(bainuu) 04:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete – Template is redundant as it has no viable wikilinks & the main article was deleted. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 04:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:12, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Depreciated, all instances replaced with {{Sequence}}. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 03:12, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- delete as redundant. Frietjes (talk) 19:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.