Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 13

< July 12	July 14 >

July 13

Template:Dnr-csd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dnr-csd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{Uw-speedy1}} and others. Frietjes (talk) 00:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DKSS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DKSS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

we don't need user signature templates in template space. Frietjes (talk) 23:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as templates in signatures are highly discourages - see WP:SIG#NoTemplates. Give the user a chance to copy the wikicode to the signature box in his preferences page and then delete. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:December Biotechnology anecdote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:December Biotechnology anecdote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:December Biotechnology question (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:46, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DAYSTOSUNDAY

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DAYSTOSUNDAY (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DABHK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DABHK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cladogram2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cladogram2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

don't think we need this when this works just fine. if you want to limit the width, then wrap it in a simple wikitable. Frietjes (talk) 23:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CSMtopic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CSMtopic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

same reason we deleted CNNtopic and Economist topic. we should also consider nominating {{Aljazeeratopic}}, {{Bloombergtopic}}, {{JPosttopic}}, {{Guardian topic}}, {{NYTtopic}}, and {{WSJtopic}} for the same reason. Frietjes (talk) 21:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CSOC Standings Start

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CSOC Standings Start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:CSOC Standings Entry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:CSOC Standings End (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CGBY1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, merged with Template:Colonial governors by year Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CGBY1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:CGBY2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now merged with {{CGBY}}. Frietjes (talk) 21:20, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CBSB Schedule Start

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CBSB Schedule Start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Burgess Shale localities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Burgess Shale localities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no longer in use (merged with sidebar). Frietjes (talk) 18:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pages-begin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, now merged with Template:Pages Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:12, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pages-begin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Pages-end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no longer needed now that I merged these with {{pages}} (old syntax required passing the list page pages twice, so the new syntax is less error prone, and more concise). Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vancouver Whitecaps FC managers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vancouver Whitecaps FC managers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article was moved without discussion and the name is not common in North America. Unlikely that it will be used as a redirect. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought redirects were discussed at WP:RFD? Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chiranjeevi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:13, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chiranjeevi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We don't do "films acted in by actor" templates, do we? Plus also note that even though this template has been around for nearly 5 years, it's always been empty and has never actually contained a list of Chiranjeevi's films. DH85868993 (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. That's what filmography sections in articles are for. Lynch 7 05:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Blank template plus not a valid subject for template. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – We have a separate page for his filmography. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, maybe speedy As an article, this qualifies for speedy delete A3 (no content), but this doesn't seem to apply for templates. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mafia series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mafia series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN: Only links to three articles. Izno (talk) 02:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Navigates few articles. Gongshow ^Talk 13:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Channel Tunnel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was moved to WP:WikiProject Trains/Channel Tunnel. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Channel Tunnel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has no transclusions and very few meaningful incoming links. A better railway route diagram is present at Eurostar#Mainline_routes. No explaination for the placing of {{transclusionless}}. Seems to no longer be needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Projectify move to a subpage of WP:TWP, say WP: WikiProject Trains/Channel Tunnel, since it's for their use. -- 70.49.127.65 (talk) 05:41, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment only about 5% of Eurostar's route is in the Channel Tunnel. The template maps are completely unrelated, although it's useful that it's been picked up that the template has been dropped. —Sladen (talk) 10:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

move without redirect to a subpage of WP:WikiProject Trains. Frietjes (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Interactive Achievement Award for Game of the Year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Interactive Achievement Award for Game of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Interactive Achievement Award for Action Game of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I personally don't believe the Interactive Achievement Awards have distinguished themselves as the "industry gold standard" for video game awards in the same way that the Oscars and the Golden Globes have for films. There are a number of other "Game of the Year" type awards which pursue the "Academy" route to prestige, such as Game Developers Choice Awards and BAFTA Games Awards. As such, I don't think a navbox uniting these winners is justified in the same way that all Oscar winners of each category are united in navbox form. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - We don't judge on whether it's the "gold standard", we judge on notability. --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you're misunderstanding what my deletion rationale is. I don't think navigation between these articles is useful in the same way that an Academy Award navbox is. I have no doubt in my mind that these awards are notable, but that's not the question at hand in a template deletion discussion---usefulness is. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Regardless of the notability of the award (it is), navboxes are meant to serve as a navigational aid, not as a list of winners. Given these games occupy wildly different genres and numerous separate platforms, the value of this template as a navigational aid is about nil. Reso lute 02:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete, the award is notable, but we can navigate between winners using the award article, or a category. we simply don't need a navbox for this as it just adds to too much at the bottom of the article. Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.