Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 7

< January 6	January 8 >

January 7

Template:Fantasy Manager Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fantasy Manager Series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only one working link (redundant) Cloudz 679 12:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Chicagoland municipality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Chicagoland municipality (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox settlement}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Chicago does not need its own.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these also have at times been misued to spread false data.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Infobox settlement. --Funandtrvl (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not only is it redundant per nom, but it also is missing many of the fields in Infobox settlement. No reason for Chicago to have a different standard than everywhere else. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 06:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect as appropriate. Imzadi 1979 → 21:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.