Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 12

< December 11	December 13 >

December 12

Template:Charleston-Huntington area roads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Charleston-Huntington area roads (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Creating a template that is just dozens of links, most of them redlinks, serves little purpose. If you're going to have a template, at least present major roads in some context. Bitmapped (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently in the process of creating articles from those redlinks. Please do not delete just yet. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 22:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—this template is bloated with links, when just adding Category:Transportation in the Charleston & Huntington metropolitan areas to the articles will work just as well to bind the articles together. Now, that category is even problematic because of the "&" in the name, and the fact that these are two separate, but adjacent, metropolitan areas. I suggest that Presidentman rethink the situation and come up with better solutions. Imzadi 1979 → 23:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Purge most of the links. For what it's worth, this is the area we're discussing. As it is, this navbox has zero utility as a navigational aide. It would be more useful if you cut out the state highways, leaving only the Interstates and US Highways. –Fredddie ™ 04:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete red link farm, and the bounds of the geographical area are arbitrary. --Rs chen 7754 04:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The bounds are not arbitrary. They are defined by the OMB. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which is arbitrary, because I'm sure that when people are looking at the template, they aren't thinking about the OMB, whatever that is. --Rs chen 7754 21:08, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And you've included two separate metropolitan areas, which is even more arbitrary. If you want a list of links to create, put it in your user space, but not template space. Imzadi 1979 → 03:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete, as too bloated, and replace with Category:Transportation in the Charleston & Huntington metropolitan areas if it's not in the articles already. Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Catch 22 (Tinchy Stryder album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:44, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Catch 22 (Tinchy Stryder album) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only five of the album's songs have links and each of those are already linkable through Template:Tinchy Stryder singles. Same rationale was applied in the TfD for Template:Loud (Rihanna album). Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 21:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete, and replace with Template:Tinchy Stryder singles where necessary. Frietjes (talk) 22:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Fighet Pilot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:G2. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Fighet Pilot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Infobox aviator Sven Manguard Wha? 17:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More accurately, it's a completely broken test edit. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 18:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete if that's the case. MSJapan (talk) 19:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy; obvious G2 candidate. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as G2 Bulwersator (talk) 07:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jewish Community Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jewish Community Centre (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

By and large, JCCs are not notable; half the template as it stands now is redlinked, and the main article indicates that there are over 350 centers in various countries. WP is not a travel directory. MSJapan (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete, better served by a category. Frietjes (talk) 22:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
question Do you have a specific Wikipedia policy that can justify the deletion of this template? Thanks, Magister Scienta ^talk 04:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Stockholm Central

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stockholm Central (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old and unused template. 186.73.132.154 (talk) 02:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Flag color box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Flag color box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template and generally redundant to other templates, like {{Color box}}. 186.73.132.154 (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a width is specified for flagColorBox and not for colorBox, so perhaps colorBox should add a parameter to specify width. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no need to add a parameter which isn't being used to a template which is getting by without it already. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fairtrade labelling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fairtrade labelling (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by {{Fair trade}}. 186.73.132.154 (talk) 01:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.