Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 4

< December 3	December 5 >

December 4

Template:By-nc-nd 3.0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:By-nc-nd 3.0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless! Mhiji (talk) 16:23, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is the name of a Creative commons license. However, it is non-free by our standards, so changing it to a license tag would be WP:T2 I think. And in its current form it's pointless. --N Y Kevin @812, i.e. 18:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Kevin. Reh man 10:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, simply pointless. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Brunei Barracudas team roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:54, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brunei Barracudas team roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 2 articles. Mhiji (talk) 16:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, useless navbox. Reh man 10:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 17:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Arizona Diamondbacks retired numbers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arizona Diamondbacks retired numbers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 17:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary, unused. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:19, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AstrAri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AstrAri (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrTau (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrGem (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrCan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrLeo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrVir (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrLib (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrSco (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrSag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrCap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrAqu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:AstrPis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary templates. Mhiji (talk) 15:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused, and completely unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Templates creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Books of Hamid Bin Ahmad Al-Rifaie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Books of Hamid Bin Ahmad Al-Rifaie (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Red links! Mhiji (talk) 15:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, useless. Reh man 10:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Films of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Films of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Actor filmography templates not supported per consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers/Consensus summaries Managerarc^[talk] 09:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Mhiji (talk) 13:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 15:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:37, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Asian Computer College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asian Computer College (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is used in one article only, and it is the only link included in the template. Totally useless. — JL 09 ^{talk (site)}_contribs 08:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Mhiji (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete simply useless, only used in one article. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BAFTA templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep/delete/redirect, basically do whatever WOSlinker says. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BAFTA Award Best Actor 1980-1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award Best Supporting Actress 1980-1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actor 2000-present (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role 1968-1979 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role 1980-1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role 2000-2019 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actress 2000-present (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actress in a Leading Role (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actress in a Supporting Role (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Adapted Screenplay (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Original Screenplay (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Supporting Actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BAFTA Award for Best Supporting Actress 2000-present (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Various unused, unnecessary navboxes. Mhiji (talk) 04:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A random pick {{BAFTA Award for Best Actress in a Leading Role}} shows it used by many pages... Rehman 10:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no transclusions though. There are only links to it from these pages because it is linked to from another navbox. Mhiji (talk) 13:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's transcluded within a transclusion. (This is different than it being transcluded by another template.) In other words, a transclusion to these templates is a parameter of a transclusion to a template on each of the pages on which it is reported as a link. Regardless, the point is that outright deletion of all of these templates will result in the loss of content on article pages. The templates are not unused. --Bsherr (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete some:
- Keep some: Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role, Template:BAFTA Award for Best Actress in a Leading Role, Template:BAFTA Award for Best Adapted Screenplay, Template:BAFTA Award for Best Original Screenplay & Template:BAFTA Award for Best Supporting Actor -- WOSlinker (talk) 12:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect according to WOSlinker's proposal. I assume WOSlinker proposes redirection too, correct? --Bsherr (talk) 16:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect is fine instead of delete but the ones I listed for delete in my comments don't have an useful links to them which is why I said delete. -- WOSlinker (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fair enoguh, then. I'd support delete if no links. --Bsherr (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Templates creators notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fully support WOSlinker's proposal. Mhiji (talk) 21:39, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Agent Orange

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Agent Orange (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with only one article in it. Mhiji (talk) 04:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Annie Wilson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G2 Obvious test page. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Annie Wilson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Random text. Mhiji (talk) 04:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, per G2. Reh man 10:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete not a template, just some random text. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete Not eligible for speedy since the text is (currently) coherent. OTOH it looks useless enough that it won't do well in article space. --N Y Kevin @819, i.e. 18:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BusyUniversitySemester

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per T3 and G7 Mhiji (talk) 03:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BusyUniversitySemester (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused unnecessary template. Redundant to Template:Busy Mhiji (talk) 04:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unusend and unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I created the template. No problem with deletion--I decided to switch to the similar Template:BusyUniversityStudent. --La comadreja _{formerly AFriedman} RESEARCH (talk) 19:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bumthang District

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per G7. Mhiji (talk) 01:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bumthang District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with only 2 links. Mhiji (talk) 04:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:55, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I apparently created this (and its companions) some time ago. Not sure why now, possibly as extension of Indian district templates, but there doesn't seem to be much to put in them. All 8 in Category:Bhutan district templates should go (Crusoe8181 (talk) 23:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TUFF Puppy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TUFF Puppy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Way too soon (show debuted in September). Navigates only the main article, Butch Hartman's and Nickelodeon's, used only on the parent article. At this point it's extremely unlikely that any of the characters will develop articles. (Note that I removed the cast since we don't do that in navboxes.) One of the most egregious WP:NENANs I've ever seen. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Mhiji (talk) 04:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:55, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Football table start

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football table start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Football table blue row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Football table green row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Football table red row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Football table yellow row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fbt-row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These templates are unused and basically redundant to the corresponding handball templates (e.g., {{hbt-row}}). Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Mhiji (talk) 04:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, may qualify G2. Reh man 10:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment can you rename the handball templates to a more generic name? 65.94.45.167 (talk) 06:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Income of the world

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep now that redlinks have been suppressed. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Income of the world (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Red links. Not useful. Mhiji (talk) 03:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nice big red box. Reh man 10:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Three of the articles are created, and should indeed have a navbox linking them. --Bsherr (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- But this is not used on any of the 3 articles (probably because it is just a big red box). I agree it might be useful if there were more articles, but it is unlikely they will be created any time soon, so the red links shouldn't be there per WP:RED. Perhaps it could be kept with just the three articles (and adding it to the bottom of those articles), but keeping it in its current state is pointless. Mhiji (talk) 18:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Redlinks are a significant way Wikipedia grows. ~~But if you don't like the redlinks, you can delete them.~~ The template is still useful for navigation to the articles that exist. --Bsherr (talk) 03:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Never mind, this is a world topics template. They automatically list every country in the world. --Bsherr (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I realise red links can be useful. But per WP:REDNOT and WP:NAVBOX#Properties, red links should not be used in navboxes. Navboxes are supposed to be for navigation, not to provide a massive list of articles which could be created. Mhiji (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - Plastikspork found the way to disable them. --Bsherr (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        Cool. Might as well keep it then. Mhiji (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've added it to the three constituent articles. --Bsherr (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Administrative divisions of the United States sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Administrative divisions of the United States sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Administrative levels of Romania sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:28, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Administrative levels of Romania sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 10:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator and significant contributors notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The template has been integrated into Template:Politics and Government of Romania. Could it be redirected there instead of deleting it? Nergaal (talk) 05:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Nergaal. --Bsherr (talk) 15:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BUAFLinfobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BUAFLinfobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary infobox. Mhiji (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as unused. Reh man 10:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Broaddus Battlers football coach navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy per request Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:18, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Broaddus Battlers football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with all red links. Mhiji (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, useless navbox. Reh man 11:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but before you do, please userfy (move into) into my workspace. I'll keep it in my incubator and if I run across any notable information for the coaches on the list, it will help with my research. (I'd do it now, but it's "bad taste" to move a template under discussion--whoever closes, please send it to me and let me know you did it. Thanks!)--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- More details definitely please userfy. I've done some research, and I think they'll all be notable for how BAD the program was! Operated for 25 years, only 4 winning seasons (and two of those were 2-1!). This is a story, but one to be worked on later...--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not used, no articles to navigate among, and no likelihood of those articles being written any time soon. But if anyone ever does start writing about Broaddus football, there should be no prejudice against this template being recreated. cmadler (talk) 20:42, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was snowball keep. Nominator changed position, all other positions are to keep except one, predating nominator's change, that includes per nominator as rationale, and I think would be likely to change on reconsideration. Nonadministrator closure. Bsherr (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unnecessary. Per nom. Reh man 11:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per WP:Nav. These links would clutter the "See also" section in many of these articles, and this template provides a clearer way to navigate the articles related to the topic. • Freechildtalk 14:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- But its not used anywhere... Mhiji (talk) 14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - That's because I just created it a few weeks ago and haven't had time to install it. I will make time, just for you, Mhiji. • Freechildtalk 15:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as now used. Mhiji (talk) 16:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and use appropriately. User:Fred Bauder Talk 00:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep looks good, well done.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:33, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:)))

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 14:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:))) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep What do you mean unnecessary? It displays }}} (three brace brackets), which have special meaning on MediaWiki, so are hard to type. 64.229.102.230 (talk) 05:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I must agree with the above anon. Much like Template:)), the template in question might serve as a useful alternative for those who don't want to bother with the longer <nowiki></nowiki> markup. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 05:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and speedy close, per above. Reh man 11:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:(((

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 15:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:((( (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep What do you mean unnecessary? It displays {{{ (three brace brackets), which have special meaning on MediaWiki, so are hard to type. 64.229.102.230 (talk) 05:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I must again agree with 64.229.102.230. Much like Template:)), the template in question might serve as a useful alternative for those who don't want to bother with the longer markup. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 05:21, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and speedy close, per above. Reh man 11:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Sit Down, Shut Up Season 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 14:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Sit Down, Shut Up Season 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 02:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unnecessary, per nom. Reh man 11:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused and unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contributors notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary. Pancake (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Sit Down, Shut Up Season 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 14:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Sit Down, Shut Up Season 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 02:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unnecessary, per nom. Reh man 11:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused and unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary. Pancake (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox television Worst Cooks in America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 14:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox television Worst Cooks in America (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 02:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as unused. Reh man 11:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused and unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Template creator notified --Bsherr (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox diocese

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Moot, already in WP:TFD/H waiting to be merged. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox diocese (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Diocese (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox diocese with Template:Infobox Diocese.
Duplication. Mhiji (talk) 02:15, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SBM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was posting at wp:rm. Terrillja _talk 03:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SBM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a clearly named template. Propose rename to Template:Summit Business Media Terrillja _talk 01:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This should be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here (see Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Header#What_not_to_propose_for_discussion_here). Mhiji (talk) 02:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.