Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 June 7

< June 6	June 8 >

June 7

Template:TxRouteBox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox is outdated. It has been replaced by {{Infobox TX State Highway}} — Holderca1 19:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused, unneeded, redundant, and possible SNOW candidate had it not been listed here. (→zel zany - review) 20:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Obsolete. 25or6to4 21:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Feedloadr 22:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why on Earth? --Booksworm ^{Sprechen-sie Koala?} 08:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above. Evilclown93 21:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TxFMBox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox is outdated. It has been replaced by {{Infobox TX State Highway}} — Holderca1 19:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused, unneeded, redundant, and possible SNOW candidate had it not been listed here. (→zel zany - review) 20:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Obsolete. These two boxes served us well. 25or6to4 21:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Feedloadr 22:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pointlessness at its worst --Booksworm ^{Sprechen-sie Koala?} 08:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above. Evilclown93 21:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Beijing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Single-use infobox. Redundant to Infobox Settlement to which it was replaced with. — MJCdetroit 16:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete single-use overspecialized redundant infobox with a valid replacement. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 11:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if you ask me, this kind of thing almost borderlines WP:CSD G6 (housekeeping). --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 11:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I took the liberty of checking Infobox Shanghai, Chongqing, Tianjin, Guangzhou, Hong Kong. They don't exist. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 11:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shanghai had the same type of infobox but it was manually hard-coded into the page. Replaced it with this edit —MJCdetroit 12:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. This is the first time I've seen such a template, and there is no use for it. Evilclown93 19:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we don't need single-purpose infoboxes like this. --Haemo 07:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2007 Miami Dolphins staff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Has been embedded into 2007 Miami Dolphins season instead of being used as a template. — Pats1 14:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think the template was substituted, and it is identical to this tempate. Evilclown93 19:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is, and was originally designed to be a constant template after the normal one was modified. However, this would create an unnecessary template for every different Dolphins season. Pats1 20:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Therefore I feel this should be deleted and the TfD closed per WP:SNOW. Evilclown93 20:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't serve any purpose anymore. --Haemo 07:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete single-use. –Pomte 09:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2007 New England Patriots staff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon^{[omg plz]} 17:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Has been embedded into 2007 New England Patriots season instead of being used as a template. — Pats1 14:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think the template was substituted, and it is identical to this tempate. Evilclown93 19:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is, and was originally designed to be a constant template after the normal one was modified. However, this would create an unnecessary template for every different Patriots season. Pats1 20:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Therefore I feel this should be deleted and the TfD closed per WP:SNOW. Evilclown93 20:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete single-use. –Pomte 09:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Horror Icons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unencyclopedic and notable POV template. Mark McDavid 13:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I think saying the Classic characters are iconic (Dracula, Frankenstein, ect ect) isn't POV, but the Modern characters part is POV. --DrBat 22:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Some people come and go and add false icons, but most people re-edit it to make sure they're all icons. Enter Movie 02:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep' It is a bit subject to POV and needs cleanup, but I don't see how it warrants a deletion.--CyberGhostface 18:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - I would keep it, but make it have an NPOV. Booksworm ^{Sprechen-sie Koala?} 08:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Rename~~ "Horror Film Killers" or something --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 23:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- On second thought, perhaps spin off the whole NPOV-threatening modern section into a new template called "Horror Film Serial Killers" --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 23:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I was thinking in more of the lines of "Iconic horror villians in cinema." Enter Movie 02:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Sure as hell needs to be cleaned up in the modern horror icons, though. --Plasma Twa 2 03:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per above. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 13:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I do not see how it is uncyclopedic, but it could use some cleaning. People might try to add in their own favourite horror icons though, so maybe a consensus or something? --Kaizer13 03:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As long as the modern section is kept to characters that have been in notable film series.--Piemanmoo 03:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Too subjective for an encyclopedia. Prolog 12:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bcratbacklog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template isn't need. There are three areas for 'crats to look at. The Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard is usually faster. See Changing_username#.7B.7BBcratbacklog.7D.7D. --Wikihermit ^{(Talk • HermesBot)} 02:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 02:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As stated, only about three pages would ever need bureaucrat attention, so there is no point to having a template and category, really. -Amarkov moo! 04:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, noticeboard seems more useful than this template. Carlosguitar 10:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As creator, I created it as WP:CHU was becoming backlogged when Secretlondon went on a Wikibreak, their is also Category:Bureaucratic backlog which will have to deleted if this one is. The Sunshine Man 11:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not needed, and it can be always recreated if there is an actual bcrat backlog for a few days. Anyhow, a crat backlog is really rare. Evilclown93 19:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.