Jump to content

Wikipedia:Signpost/Templates/Signpost-article-comments-end/commentspage/doc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Usage

[edit]

This appears transcluded at the top of talk pages for Signpost articles. These talk pages are themselves transcluded in a couple of places:

  • The Signpost articles themselves
Underneath the article, e.g. Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-01-30/Arbitration report.
  • Single-talk pages
All of the talk pages for an issue in a row, e.g. Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-01-30

The idea is that this template gives a little link back to the main article, and explains that it's a comment page, but ONLY on the talk page itself -- in both of the places where this talk page gets transcluded, this is basically unhelpful noise, so it isn't included there.


Code

[edit]

There is kind of a complicated test going on here, which is kind of complicated, so I will try to excerpt and explain:

{{#ifeq:{{is time|{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|2}}}} {{NAMESPACE}}<!--
        -->|1 Wikipedia talk

This is a bit of fun with parser functions.

Classes and styles

[edit]

This uses two classes, both styled at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/external.css and Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/master.css (split out on 22:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)).

  • signpost-commentspage1
  • signpost-commentspage2

Sample transclusion of this template (includes full Signpost comments page)

[edit]
Note: original page is Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-01-30/Arbitration report.
  • The current scope is "all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan"; the amendment would expand it to cover "all pages related to political or religious topics and closely related people in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, including but not limited to castes". — Isn't that a contraction rather than an expansion? —2d37 (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, I believe. I will double-check to make sure. jp×g 22:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]