Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/block threat

block threat

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Potguru (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Ohnoitsjamie (talk · contribs) – injuring party

Articles affected by this dispute

1. [1] User is making a spurilous claim that cannabis is a concensus term without supporting the same. User incorrectly warned me that I will be blocked if I edit the page but use allows other warring party to continue to deface and rename (without reference) an article. User is showing favoritism because user believes, as does original abuser, that a term has reached consensus even though there is little to no evidence of the same.
2. Balloon animal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

{{{links}}}

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Agree = I agree that potguru was unjustly warned.
2. Disagree1 = I think that both parties should be warned.
3. Disagree2 = I think that only Viriditas should be warned.

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Potguru (talk) 22:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #3, "The dispute is not exclusively about the behaviour of a Wikipedia editor". For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 22:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC) (Chairperson)