Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/White people
Appearance
White people
[edit]Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.
|
Resolved:
Inactivity.
- This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.
Involved parties
[edit]Articles involved
[edit]Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
[edit]- Talk:White people#Request for Comment
- Talk:White people#Reversion (continues under sub-subhead "Summarizing...")
Issues to be mediated
[edit]- Should the following text be added to the lead and does it comply with WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY? Is it WP:NPOV?
- The term white people does not refer perceived color of skin per se[1]; the people described can be pinkish,[2] reddish,[citation needed] white, tan or golden brown[3] in skin color, extending the perception of white skin to a much broader set of people. In this term, white functions as a color metaphor for race,[4] one that emerged from a racialized, European historical context.[5]
- Should a modified version of the text replace it, if it does not remain?
- Is the following text a NPOV statement? Does it comply with WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY:
- The population of people classified as white has a predominant European ancestry, along with substantial ancestry from other continents. Both maternal and paternal lines among white people trace to European as well as non-European lines.
Additional issues to be mediated
[edit]None listed
Parties' agreement to mediate
[edit]- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree.--Carwil 16:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Okay as modified --Carwil 20:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Agree with CarwilVeritas et Severitas 21:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
[edit]Accepted
- For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 21:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- I can take this one. -Ste|vertigo 08:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- ^ "Referring to races by colors, such as White, Black, and Brown, tends to ob-. scure the fact that skin color and race are not the same." Frank F. Montalvo, "Surviving Race: Skin Color and the Socialization and Acculturation of Latinas," Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 13:3, 2004.
- ^ "The skin. What the skin is. Why skin colour varies. Skin problems. Look after your skin", Public Health News, 19 Jul 2004.
- ^ "TAN-TASTIC!; How to look good and stay skin safe.," Wales On Sunday (Cardiff, Wales), May 25, 2003, p42.
- ^ For extensive discussion on skin color as a metaphor for race (and not just in encounter with Japan), see Rotem Kowner, "Skin as a Metaphor: Early European Racial Views on Japan, 1548–1853," Ethnohistory 51.4 (2004) 751-778. See also, Christine Ward Gailey Politics, Colonialism and the Mutable Color of South Pacific Peoples," Transforming Anthropology 5.1&2 (1994). On historical antecedents during the European medieval period, see James H. Dee, "Black Odysseus, White Caesar: When Did 'White People' Become 'White,'?" The Classical Journal, Vol. 99, No. 2. (Dec., 2003 - Jan., 2004), p. 162ff.
- ^ Gregory Jay, [Who Invented White People? http://www.uwm.edu/~gjay/Whiteness/Whitenesstalk.html], 1998.