Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/War of the Pacific

War of the Pacific

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Keysanger (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Darkness Shines (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. War of the Pacific (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:War of the Pacific#Second revert of my edits - A failed direct discussion between editors (Permanent link [1])
• Talk:War of the Pacific#RfC: Which are the relevant facts for the LEDE regarding the 14 February 1879? - A failed Request for Comment (Permanent link [2])
• Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#War of the Pacific - A failed DRN mediation (Permanent link [3])

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. How should be described in the LEDE the events on 14. February 1879, as "War starts" or "Crisis deepens".
2. How should be named the subsection about the 14 February, as "War start" or "Occupation of Antofagasta"?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Keysanger (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject: No acceptance by other party, thus prerequisite for mediation #5 not met. For the Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC) (Chairperson)