Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Syrian Civil War 2

Syrian Civil War 2

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Rqasd (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. FutureTrillionaire (talk · contribs)
3. Kudzu1 (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Syrian Civil War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2. Talk:Syrian Civil War#Advanced weaponry and tactics (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Syrian Civil War#I disagree with this edit (dropping my edits-small mortars and rockets (actual version))

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Intervening edits are not encyclopedic, sources are not WP:RS, and tone violates WP:NPOV. (TW))?
2. today I corrected his change. in addition, my sources are credible sources. this is a documentary video. this is not fiction. many authors use as sources, which are not recognized in the world media who speak well about the opposition. BUT, why can't I apply authoritative media (news release - message media+news release - a documentary film)?? the source is of translation, and a link to the translation of.

• look. if you are against such a contribution (if you are against this editing). please. detailed answer why. in order not to initiate administrative proceedings. --Rqasd (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC) you have reverted the edit, said - Undoing pov pushing and use of unreliable sources. I changed the edits. now there is no such problem? pov? unreliable sources - it is impossible. all sources is very authoritative media, they work *news*, worldwide, many years. if you do not have a source that ITAR-TASS's a lie (specifically those articles that I used), if you have no source (*battle for Syria* it's a lie). you can't delete my edits. it is outside the rules. in addition, I give the translation. I give references are free from copyright. in addition, the recording of TV ether (news release) this is the authoritative source. this is a verifiable source. moreover, *the battle for Syria* is a documentary film. other sources (if there are sources without translation tell me and I mend). but you can't simply delete all at once. my sources have become in Wikipedia. you can read about them that is large media (news)

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1

but! you don't have source. a source said: ИТАРР-TASS + *battle for Syria* (documentary film) it's a lie. can you just acknowledge their wrong?Rqasd (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Rqasd (talk) 12:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
2. Disagree. Mediation is not needed. Try WP:DRN or WP:RSN first.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3. Disagree. Mediation isn't going to be helpful in this case. -Kudzu1 (talk) 15:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Without agreement of the named parties to this dispute, we cannot proceed with formal mediation. Perhaps this should go to WP:DRN first. Sunray (talk) 19:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Mediation requires the agreement of all parties. For the Mediation Committee, Sunray (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)