Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Shooting of Michael brown
Appearance
Shooting of Michael brown
[edit]- Editors involved in this dispute
- Articles affected by this dispute
- Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
- Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#RFC
- Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#NPOV
- Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#Reactions to the grand jury process and result section
- Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#Wikipedia voice - lack of attribution
- Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#Cwobeel warring
Issues to be mediated
[edit]- Primary issues (added by the filing party)
- Whether attribution to an individual is required for statements of fact concerning the operation of a United States grand jury.
- Whether or not a specific criticism by a non-expert requires a full attribution, equivalent balance against experts in the field and a full quotation from a commentator's opinion that was not the conclusion or focus of an editorial.
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
[edit]- Agree. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline. There are several other parties not included. If all parties involved are included I may re-consider.- Cwobeel (talk) 21:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
[edit]- Chairperson's note: I would ordinarily reject this case at this point under prerequisite for mediation #5, as a majority of the parties have not agreed to mediation, but I'm going to allow a few days — let's say until Sunday, January 4, at 11:59 UTC — for both parties to add additional parties in light of Cwobeel's comments, above. Either currently-listed party may add additional parties and the maintenance bot will notify them. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 07:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC) (chairperson)
- Reject. No additional parties added, no agreement from majority of listed parties. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)