Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Shooting of Michael brown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shooting of Michael brown

[edit]
Editors involved in this dispute
  1. ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) – filing party
  2. Cwobeel (talk · contribs)
Articles affected by this dispute
  1. Shooting of Michael Brown (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

Issues to be mediated

[edit]
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
  1. Whether attribution to an individual is required for statements of fact concerning the operation of a United States grand jury.
  2. Whether or not a specific criticism by a non-expert requires a full attribution, equivalent balance against experts in the field and a full quotation from a commentator's opinion that was not the conclusion or focus of an editorial.
Additional issues (added by other parties)
  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

[edit]
  1. Agree. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Decline. There are several other parties not included. If all parties involved are included I may re-consider.- Cwobeel (talk) 21:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

[edit]
  • Chairperson's note: I would ordinarily reject this case at this point under prerequisite for mediation #5, as a majority of the parties have not agreed to mediation, but I'm going to allow a few days — let's say until Sunday, January 4, at 11:59 UTC — for both parties to add additional parties in light of Cwobeel's comments, above. Either currently-listed party may add additional parties and the maintenance bot will notify them. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 07:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC) (chairperson)[reply]