Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Porsche
Appearance
Porsche
[edit]- Editors involved in this dispute
- Articles affected by this dispute
- Porsche (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Porsche SE (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (a redirect to Porsche)
- Porsche AG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (another redirect to Porsche)
- Porsche (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
- Talk:Porsche#Porsche SE and Porsche AG split (The current discussion)
- Wikipedia_talk:Article titles/Archive 47#RfC: When COMMONNAME depends on country, culture, or demography (The RfC with Porsche as an example)
- User talk:S Marshall#RfC: When COMMONNAME depends on country, culture, or demography (Partly on the issue of "typical en.wiki editors")
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 August 15#Volkswagen categories (Failed attempt at obtaining info from WikiProject Categories)
Issues to be mediated
[edit]- Primary issues (added by the filing party)
- What article to give the 'Porsche' article title after a split of Porsche article.
- WP:TITLE and related guidelines lack the recognition that common use of a term may be quite different between "average en.wiki editors" and "average en.wiki readers".
- The abstract of the issues in the current discussion is summarized at the beginning of Talk:Porsche#Porsche SE and Porsche AG split.
- The underlying issues are summarized at the beginning of Wikipedia_talk:Article titles/Archive 47#RfC: When COMMONNAME depends on country, culture, or demography in the Issue Section.
- The second issue may not be appropriate for MedCom to judge on, but it is the source of this dispute, so it is very preferable to me if the decision could indicate MedCom's view on it in some fashion.
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
[edit]- Agree. Yiba (talk | contribs) 09:55, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Disagree. BilCat (talk) 12:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Disagree, as the discussion and debate has already occurred in the normal manner and the filer of this request was the only one who did not agree to the consensus. Warren (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
[edit]- Recommend rejection: No acceptance of mediation by opponents. — TransporterMan (TALK) 13:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC) (Committee member)
- Reject: Prerequisite for mediation #5 not met, acceptance by a majority of parties. For the Mediation Committee. — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC)