Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Michael D. Colacino

Michael D. Colacino

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. RyLaughlin (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Ukexpat (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Michael D. Colacino (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• User talk:Ukexpat/Archive 39#Notability Template Removal
• Talk:Michael_D._Colacino#RfC: Is this subject noteworthy?
• Talk:Michael D. Colacino#Request edit on 15 November 2013

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. I believe this subject meets Wikipedia:Notability_(people) and Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#People who are relatively unknown guidelines. Should this article have the Wikipedia:Notability_(people) template removed?

Mediation not required, I have removed the template. This wasn't a candidate for mediation in any event, I just hadn't got round to responding to the request on my talk page.--ukexpat (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. RyLaughlin (talk) 17:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Recommend rejection as moot. Also no substantial discussion before filing. — TransporterMan (TALK) 18:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC) (committee member)
• Based on the above discussion, I am rejecting this request. PhilKnight (talk) 02:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)