Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Eugenics in Showa Japan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Resolved:

One party withdrew

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Eugenics in Showa Japan

[edit]

Involved parties

[edit]

Articles involved

[edit]

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

[edit]
  • Third party neutral native Japanese speaker advice on source content [3]
  • Request for comment. [4]
  • Talkpage [5]
  • user:ZayZayEM's request for protection of 21th October [[6]]

Issues to be mediated

[edit]
The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.
  • Inclusion of references, sources and links added by other users
  • Use of encyclopedic level of English

Additional issues to be mediated

[edit]
Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there is more than two parties involved in this case.

Parties' agreement to mediate

[edit]
All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed. Comments can be made at the talk page.

#Agree. --Flying tiger 14:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC) I quit this useless process. User:Azukimonaka's inhability to read and properly understand english sources makes the mediation impossible. User:Azukimonaka has made his mind on what he thinks he understands from sources and even comments from other users, such as User:Ryan Postlethwaite's few comments on the strong relation between leprosy policies and japanese eugenism, can not help convincing him. In fact, the process never really begun and was characterized by sporadic implication from mediator User:Ryan Postlethwaite which led to a flagrant lack of interest by User:ZayZayEM. So far, the so-called "mediation" was only a remake of the silly war edits I had with User:Azukimonaka since september 2007. --Flying tiger (talk) 14:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Agree --ZayZayEM 01:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Agree --Azukimonaka 20:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

[edit]
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section.
Accept.
For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 01:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.