Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

[edit]
Editors involved in this dispute
  1. Hogfanjax (talk · contribs) – filing party
  2. Hogfanjax (talk · contribs)
  3. Muboshgu (talk · contribs)
Articles affected by this dispute
  1. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

Issues to be mediated

[edit]
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
  1. Addition present and resolved for months removed with poor discretion with opinion that Hatch act violations without charges are numerous for directors of agencies which is not ture and cited properly. Also removed further additions of controversies that happened at the CFPB with GAO citations of investigations and previous hearing citations leading to additions of controversies. User Moboshgu removed additions out of spite and political partisanship.
Additional issues (added by other parties)
  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

[edit]
  1. Agree. There is not much to discuss, I cited a GAO report while under Cordray's tenure, obviously a controversy, where this was posted. User muboshgu removed purposefully. I feel uncomfortable discussing with Muboshgu due to threatening nature of messages (my perception, maybe they are standard which is worse actually) which is why I went right to mediation. As you can see the user refuses to mediate. Secondly doesn't it make sense to discuss cited additions BEFORE removal, this seems counter intuitive which is why i brought my grievances here as well. Hogfanjax (talk) 19:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Disagree. I said discuss on the article's talk page. You're jumping past a few steps here. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

[edit]