Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 October 14
Requesting feedback and advice on the article I have created. I am a graphic novel enthusiast and am naturally happy about high quality graphic novels starting up in India. This article is about a particularly good and popular Indian graphic comic/novel and would appreciate feedback, suggestions and advice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Varunr/Level10_Comics
Varunr (talk) 04:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, this is my first article and I was wondering whether the language might be a little too scientific. Any comments are appreciated. Thanks!
User:Altefr87/Hybrid procedures in cardiac surgery
Altefr87 (talk) 09:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, please read WP:REFB and WP:Named references how to cite the references correctly (say inline and multiple times by using named references) and please remove some of the useless wikilinks (which points to a disambiguation page) or which are already used (didn't checked if you doubled linked some) mabdul 14:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the feedback. When you say double linked, do you mean when the word "Apple" appears twice in my article, I should only place a wikilink for the first time it appears? Thanks!
We are a group of pharmacy students that wrote this article on Discovery and development of antiandrogens. We tried to cover the history of this class of drugs, characteristics of current antiandrogen drugs and what current research is focusing on. We would love to get some feedback.
Wikihop5 (talk) 14:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I need this reviewed. Last time I was told this wasn't "notable" to be posted, however I have added some additional facts that demonstrate the notability of this company. I have found similar pages of other Utah-based companies, so I think this company deserves a page as well.
Since1953 (talk) 19:09, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- There is no article and even the log don't say that ever such a page existed.
- After searching in your contributions, I found out that you mean that draft: User:Since1953/TV Specialists, Inc.
- Please add independent, third party references like (online/offline) newspaper articles, magazine article, etc, since every reference is a primary source (directly involved.)
- Check reference #1 and #4: there is no direct link and it is not really clear what do you mean with that reference. Keep in mind that every fact/claim has to be verifyable by the reader through references. mabdul 14:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
This is my first article. I am a bit unsure of formatting, and the way references are listed. I tried diligently to find reliable references.
Averyhart (talk) 01:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Please check WP:REFB and try to add the references in a correct way. Please keep in mind: every claim/fact in your article has to be verifiable by the reader through references! Please read also the links you get provided in the boxes at the top and try to fix them by trimming down the article and the tone. mabdul 15:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to see the cleanup tag removed.