Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 March 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please review the article to remove the "new article" box. Thank you!

Buhtelka (talk) 00:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia covers topics that have been noticed to a significant degree by sources that has no significant connection to the subject. See WP:N. Since most of the material in your draft article seems to come from sources connected to Chemical Diversity, the article as written does not come across as one for which Wikipedia would want to provide coverage. I suggest removing the material from the article that is from sources connected to Chemical Diversity and develop the article from reliable sources that are independent of Chemical Diversity. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-- Mishalpatel (talk) 01:49, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia covers topics that have been noticed to a significant degree by sources that has no significant connection to the subject. See WP:N. You may want to concentrate on meeting the requirements of General notability guideline. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:49, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Raquela is a beloved Broadway actress and well known Billboard charting artist who is a staple in the Dance music industry. I'm seeking suggestions, guidance, approval or any advice on this new article I'm about to contribute to the community. Thank you in advance for your time. -- Rog hung (talk) 03:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From this, take a look at WP:Copyright. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Uzma, but the 'quote' you directed me to is a direct quote from Miss Raquela, so there should be no copyright conflicts. Because this is my first full article here, please define to me why it is wrong to use a direct quote from the subject I'm writing about. And thank you again for you time. I do appreciate it.

As it is my first artical, I would like it to be review the content for validated, structure and general feedback.


Sangeen01 (talk) 05:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 March 10. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This simple article was written for my school's development economics project.

Andeousquek (talk) 09:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for general feedback on the article. I have been working with Leo Rubinfien so that it is how he would like it. I also am unsure what to do next--- how to publish it etc... Once it is published the gallery at Stanford University are going to be adding to it as will Robert Mann Gallery. Can you please let me know how to move forward? THANKS!

Freyapowell (talk) 13:26, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please move my article from my draftspace to main?

I don't have a Move tab


Secretarykkg (talk) 15:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Donnamlarson (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC) I think the article is referenced and ready to go. I just need someone to make that final call on it. Thanks in advance for your time.Donnamlarson (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This short homeopathy-related alternative medicine and psudoscience article was highly edit warred and lacked RS. I was asked to help, and rewrote the enire article. Both side seem happy[1], and removed the neutrality tag[2], but I would like an opinion of someone who was not involved in the log-term edit warring. Also, this was one of my first major contribution to an article at WP (my counts are misleading, mostly recent small edits to a handful of articles), and I wanted comments from more experienced editors. PPdd (talk) 17:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if this article is OK or if I need to add more to it - I will be adding more but hopefully this is going in the right direction. Thanks!


Realitytheatre (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if this is a sufficient start. Will accumulate much more information about the company later, but wanted to make sure it is considered 'encyclopedic' first.


Murraysiegel (talk) 18:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PLACE A LINK TO YOUR ARTICLE HEREhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richmark40/Lamp_of_the_the_Brotherhood

[edit]

As a first timer, I am not sure if this article is posted. I will want to include photos. It seems I will not be allowed until I have 4 days membership and 10 edits.


Richmark40 (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first article


KnightTemplarMP (talk) 23:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]