Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 June 15

Back to main feedback page

Index of all pages

Closure (Scarlett Belle song)

Closure (Scarlett Belle song)

I am requesting feedback for this article. Thanks Ozurbanmusic 01:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Also good - though might consider expanding the lead section. ~ QwerpQwertus ·_Contact Me_·_Talkback_· 03:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I think you should also try adding categories to the bottom of the article, so it can be listed with similar articles and also help to increase the amount of viewers to a page. You can start your search at . Once you've found a suitiable and accurate category for the article you can add them to the bottom of the article, where they will automatically appear in a bar along the bottom. If you have any more questions please ask :-) Hope this helps. Chevymontecarlo - alt 11:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

WVWV (Wikipedia:Victim of Wahabi View)

On wikipedia,many Islamic article eg.Milad,are written with wahabi ]Point of View.Which have been sourced by non-neutral wahabi sites.many wahabis consider sunni muslims as kuffar/mushrikeen.Actually which is wise versa.

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 08:52, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Copying this post to the neutral point of view noticeboard, where it seems to belong. Please look there for replies. Itsmejudith (talk) 10:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Together for Humanity Foundation

User:60.241.34.112/Together for Humanity Foundation Please review this new entry, which introduces a non-profit organization running interfaith programs in Australia. I'd appreciate help with references in particular, but any helpful comment will be great. Gal Baras (talk) 10:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You will need more reliable reference, sources, and inline citations to prove the accuracy and notability of the subject. It is also a bit too positive - you may wish to check it for neutrality. Otherwise, it's pretty good. Would you like help formatting them? ~ QwerpQwertus ·_Contact Me_·_Talkback_· 00:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Wita4/The_Washington_International_Trade_Associaton

This article provides a brief explanation to people who are unsure of what the Washington International Trade Association is and what it does in Washington, DC. The current Board of Directors and a brief summary of past events are given as well to give people an idea of what WITA does for the international trade community in the nation's capitol. Wita4 (talk) 13:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Sophia Siddiqui 6/15/2010

You may need more reliable third-party references and sources to ensure that the article is both notable and accurate - an infobox\and picture are also always good - would you like help? ~ QwerpQwertus ·_Contact Me_·Get Adopted! 00:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Dr. Kenneth O. Hill Article Review

Hello all, I've recently joined Wikipedia and have created an article on Dr. Kenneth O. Hill. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ict1969/Dr._Kenneth_O._Hill). I've read all of the new page articles outlining issues such as notability and neutrality however I hope that by posting here I can receive some constructive feedback from seasoned Wikipedia editors in case there are any major errors with the article. Thank you very much for your help! Ict1969 (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

It's very good, I cannot find any major problems, however, you may wish to add an infobox, which I can help you with if you want. Also, it seems to be ready to be moved to mainspace, would you like me to do that for you? Thanks!~ QwerpQwertus ·_Contact Me_·Get Adopted! 01:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

You've done a particulary good job with the references too, and I'm glad to see you've added categories as well. A lot of users miss these out when they create new articles. Well done. Chevymontecarlo - alt 11:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the feedback QQ and Chevymontecarlo. I would be very appreciative with help moving it over to the mainspace, I'm not exactly sure how to move it given that there are other Ken Hills present on Wikipedia. Help there would be wonderful. As well, excellent idea about an infobox, I'll take a look at other examples on Wikipedia and see if I have enough credible information to create one. Thanks again! Ict1969 (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Kprevet/Purolator_USA,_Inc.

I would like feedback on the page that I drafted for my company. We do a lot of great work in the Community and for the environment. Our history in the states is not long but has involved major players in the transportation industry. I wanted to confrorm that the information I am using is historical and note worthy, not promotional.

Any comments are appreciated.

Thanks! Kim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kprevet (talk • contribs) 19:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, as tagged, it does have neutrality problems, the text is a bit short, and it needs more reliable references and sources to prove the accuracy and notability of the subject. I would add more of these, expand it, and rewrite portions for neutrality (I see you have been working to fix that, however), that is, if you still wish to work on it - it is discouraged to work on company articles you are associated with. With these things, it would probably be a pretty good article.~ QwerpQwertus ·_Contact Me_·Get Adopted! 01:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

THE DATE SAFE PROJECT

[[1]]

Lynn C. Tolson Lynn329 Lynn329 (talk) 21:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I do not know how to change "Enter_your_new_artcle_name_here to the Date Safe Project

submitting for feedback and approval. Thank you.

Pretty good, but you might add more reliable third-party sources and references to prove the importance, notability, and accuracy of the information, such as a newspaper or big website. Expanding it would also help - it's pretty short as is (a photo and infobox are also always great). If you want, I can add the infobox for you. Good job though! I've changed the name for you. (ForFutureReference. That's called the move function - it is under a tab at the top of the page. Thanks! ~ QwerpQwertus ·_Contact Me_·Get Adopted! 01:53, 16 June 2010 (UTC)