Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 December 26

< 2010 December 25

2010 December 26

2010 December 27 >

Back to main feedback page

Index of all pages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_China_College_of_Stomatology

This is an introduction of West China College of Stomatology. West China College of Stomatology, known as the birthplace of China’s modern dental science education, was started from Ren-Ji Dental Clinic founded in 1907. The clinic, in 1912, grew into the nation’s first dental hospital to serve the local community’s needs for dental services. In 1917, the hospital became the Department of Dentistry under West China Union University and soon evolved into the College of Dentistry. In 1928, the College of Stomatology was officially founded. Since then, the College has experienced several title changes: in 1951, as Stomatological Hospital of West China University; in 1953, as Faculty of Stomatology, Sichuan Medical College; in 1985, as College of Stomatology, West China University of Medical Sciences; in 2001, as West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan after merged with Sichuan University.

Hxkqwiki (talk) 03:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't currently have any references, you need to add sources to your article to verify the statements. Without reliable sources an article is likely to get deleted. Also I think the article would benefit from being Wikified (or being made to look more like a 'proper' Wikipedia article). To do this you could perhaps add some sections and/or links to related articles on Wikipedia. Hope this is useful. Good luck with your article. Chevy monte carlo 11:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreamkind

My first article! Be gentle, please :)

Okkisaurus (talk) 06:16, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a nice job so far especially as you seem to be new to Wikipedia, but the article's references could benefit from being displayed using inline citations. Also I think unless you add more reliable sources I don't think the article's subject will pass the notability guidelines. Anyway, I think at the moment it's a nice stub, at least. Chevy monte carlo 11:50, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Romandavydov/The_Advanced_Science_Journal

Can this page go live at this stage?

Roman Davydov (talk) 12:29, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn't seem to be any tone or neutrality issues with this article which is great, although there's no real reliable sources to verify the statements in the article. Also I think the article could be considered an orphan, i.e. it has very little links to other Wikipedia articles. Chevy monte carlo 05:14, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freudenberg_IT

Hi! This is an article about a German IT company. I intend to post some more pictures on it soon Let me know your feedback & thanks in advance for taking your time to go through it :)

Shonkho (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think some parts of the article have some problems with neutrality, i.e. some parts of the article sound like an advertisement. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be neutral in tone and not sound like advertisements, so perhaps maybe making some improvements to the article's tone and the way it presents the facts might be a good thing to do. If you need any help with that please contact me. Chevy monte carlo 05:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OverClock_Checking_Tool

Raku2040 (talk) 16:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you've probably been made aware already, the article is being proposed for deletion because the article's subject isn't considered notable enough. I also don't think the article is long enough, but the main problem is the notability, which you can improve in the article by adding reliable sources. Chevy monte carlo 05:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LC_Gateley/Tancook_Schooner

Requesting suggestions on a new article about Tancook schooners.

LC Gateley (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you perhaps need to divide the article up into relevant sections to make it easier to navigate and read, but also I don't think the one printed reference is enough as the overall reliable sources for the article. Chevy monte carlo 05:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bh-uk/MADTV_Surrey

Am working on going through finalising the sources but would welcome general feedback on progress so far. Thanks. 213.105.7.249 (talk) 23:57, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a nicely done article - it's coming along well, nice job! Other than the sources that you mention I don't really think there are any immediate problems with the article. Chevy monte carlo 05:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]