Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2023 December 28
| Science desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < December 27 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 29 > |
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
December 28
[edit]density of mercury
[edit]Hi. I'm trying to understand the answer to this question[1].
Assuming that the given answer on that site is correct: I don't understand why ρ is replaced with the value 3.6 * 10^3.
My understanding is that ρ is the density of mercury, so it should be around 1.35 * 10^4. At least, that's the value I get when I google "density of mercury in kg/m3".
Every other value I understand. Alpha is the surface tension of mercury in N/m. g is the acceleration due to gravity which is 9.8 m/s2. d is the diameter of the hole given in the question which is 70 micrometer. Liberté2 (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'd like to clarify that this is not a homework question.
- I remember seeing liquids unable to escape out of tiny holes, likely due to surface tension. So I was wondering whether there's a direct relationship between minimum hole size and surface tension. Googling that lead me to this physics stackexchange [2] which has the correct equation. I tried to search for some actual applications of this equation which lead me to that toppr.com page. Liberté2 (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I haven't the foggiest, I'd agree with you. The only thing I can think of is they stuck in the density of the wrong material, but anyone in physics would know the approximate density of mercury. NadVolum (talk) 01:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The next step combines powers of ten and a few other factors (490 / 9.8), and the 3.6 changes to 13.6. So the 3.6 seems to be just a typo. --Amble (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you!!! It's indeed a typo. Liberté2 (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I should have noticed that, silly me, thanks. The 3.6 had nagged me a bit but I hadn't thought about it properly. NadVolum (talk) 14:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Resolved