Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2024 November 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Miscellaneous desk
< October 31 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 2 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


November 1

[edit]

Noodles

[edit]

And by the way, why are glass noodles so much more calorific than their egg counterparts? (running at about 350 cals/100g compared to 150 cals,) Bon appetit. SerialNumber54129 13:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this cooked or uncooked? The USDA's FoodData Central database gives
  • 351 kcal / 100 g for "Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated"[1] and
  • 384 kcal / 100 g for "Noodles, egg, dry, unenriched"[2] and
  • 138 kcal / 100 g for "Noodles, egg, unenriched, cooked, without added salt".[3]
 --Lambiam 19:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lambiam: cooked, I think. SerialNumber54129 20:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since cellophane noodles also increase substantially in weight by cooking, I suspect that your date are for uncooked cellophane noodles. The data I find on the web for cooked cellophane noodles are all over the place.  --Lambiam 21:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's why google and other search engines were invented. :) -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 07:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]
Tio be fair, my question was why calorifically one != the other. It's not that important: a good dollop of bean paste mixed in with a bowlful is food of the gods  :) SerialNumber54129 12:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]