Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2023 October 12
| Miscellaneous desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < October 11 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | Current desk > |
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
October 12
[edit]Quick reference-reliability question
[edit]Hello, do you think that this citation by independentaustralia.net is reliable and can be used? I believe it is, but I haven't encountered this publisher before, so I wanted to double check. Cheers! Johnson524 15:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah it's fine. Nanonic (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Nanonic: Thank you 🙂 Johnson524 15:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- independentaustralia.net is listed in User:Headbomb/unreliable.js as a "generally unreliable source". I'm not sure what caused it be listed there, (perhaps User:Headbomb can comment), but I would not use it without first discussing the particular page you want to cite at WP:RSN. CodeTalker (talk) 06:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- @CodeTalker: I didn't know about this, thank you for telling me so I can double check. Cheers! Johnson524 06:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- independentaustralia.net is listed in User:Headbomb/unreliable.js as a "generally unreliable source". I'm not sure what caused it be listed there, (perhaps User:Headbomb can comment), but I would not use it without first discussing the particular page you want to cite at WP:RSN. CodeTalker (talk) 06:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Nanonic: Thank you 🙂 Johnson524 15:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- In general, such questions are best asked at our Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard (WP:RS/N). --Lambiam 04:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)