Miscellaneous desk
< August 1	<< Jul \| August \| Sep >>	August 3 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

August 2

wikis

hi i need help finding a wiki with slightly less users than wikipedia and simple english wikipedia any help? thanks. not saying i dont like wikipedia i just need help finding new wikis. Raspinn61 (talk) 00:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raspinn61 "Wiki" is just a kind of software. We have a list of wiki-based sites here. Why you'd want to find random non-Wikipedia wikis is none of my business, but it does make me curious. Why would you want a site with fewer users? Surely it would make more sense to pursue a specific interest or something? Matt Deres (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And there is always Simple English Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There sure is, but since the OP specifically mentioned them, I assumed they already knew of it. Matt Deres (talk) 13:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikia is a wiki hosting website. They host hundreds (if not thousands) of wikis. Many of them have zero users. Some have just one. While you can argue that technically all of Wikia is one big wiki, it is clearly divided into many independent wikis where users don't jump from one wiki to another. 209.149.113.5 (talk) 16:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The OP might be able to create his own wiki. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 17:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible, but it is a lot of work, put in the software, add all the extensions, create the basic configuration, set up users, set up templates, make some rules about how it will be used, then you can create some content. After that you have to maintain it and keep it up to date. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you create the wiki on Wikia. Then, it is matter of creating a Wikia account and then coming up with a wiki name nobody else is using. Hmm... Does Wikia have a Wikipedia wiki? 209.149.113.5 (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My webhost apparently offers MediaWiki (as well as Wordpress and whatnot), so I could make a wiki on my own site if I had a good reason to do so. —Tamfang (talk) 07:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A type of extant giraffe alive today not mentioned in Wikipedia.

I have seen a giraffe in Kenya called a Rockefeller(?). It has a long black "stocking" on its legs. Possible only the two fore legs. Why is it not mentioned in the topic of giraffe in the Wikipedia? HENRY9504 (talk) 23:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Roger Henry[reply]

Do you mean Rothschild's giraffe? Matt Deres (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Or if you mean a specific individual giraffe that we should mention, the advice would be as follows. If he or she is suitably notable, they should have their own article. We have lots of animals with articles on Wikipedia, including 6 giraffes. If he or she isn't notable (I refer you again to our definition that I linked), they shouldn't. Either way, I can't imagine why we would name them in our article on giraffes, any more than we ought to name Iggy Pop on our article on humans. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:32, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If there were only six notable humans, that would be a valid comparison. With only six individually notable giraffes (actually, five, Victor the Giraffe redirects to Marwell Zoo), it probably makes sense to list them in the giraffe article somewhere. Matt Deres (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. I think you might have a case in point if, in fact, Wikipedia was finished. There must be many more notable giraffes. We just haven't listed them yet. Although perhaps not starting with Rockefeller(?). --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]