Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.
I was reading the Wikipedia entry on the above topic and was wondering how the direction "northeast by north" was different from the direction "north-northeast". 67.239.109.183 (talk) 16:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the illustration. You'll see that NE by N is at 33¾° and NNE is slightly closer to north at 22½°
Sorry I didn't mean a function function. But like a particular purpose. Say I want a casual suit to wear out during the day, how do I know if a particular suit won't make me look overdressed or something? --178.208.193.171 (talk) 21:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Men's dress shirt.
Any suit would be overdressed in many situations. In the US, there are fewer and fewer places and companies left that require wearing a suit each day. Suits are still worn to special occasions, though, like weddings, funerals, etc. If you can tell us where you are, what company you work for, and any other pertinent details, we may be able to help. Some general rules:
1) Most casual is a suit jacket. That is, just the jacket, not a matching pants/jacket set. Wear it with pants that look like they would go with a suit though, not jeans (jeans are sometimes worn with a suit jacket, but not to events that say "suit required"). Wear a dress shirt with it, like the one shown. A tie is optional, in this case (making it look a bit more formal). Use colors in the same family though. For example, a beige suit jacket, with dark brown pants, a brown tie, and a white shirt: [1]. If you were to add a tie, maybe brown would work here.
2) A suit is the next step up. The jacket matches the pants, and they are sold together. Also wear a dress shirt here, and a tie, but probably not cuff links. Also match colors here.
3) A tuxedo is rarely worn these days, reserved for the groomsmen at a formal wedding, for example, or rather fancy parties (black tie or white tie events). Here the dress shirt and tie (often a bow tie) are required, and maybe cuff links. Some go further, adding a cummerbund, dickey, etc. In weddings, they normally pre-select the clothing for the bridal party, so you don't need to choose your own. StuRat (talk) 21:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd argue it's in their interest to sell you the most expensive items they can, if on commission: "Never ask the barber if you need a haircut, as the answer will always be yes". StuRat (talk) 22:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We have articles on the various items of clothing I mentioned, and I provided links to them, so the OP can read up on them. Thus we are connecting them to the relevant Wikipedia articles, an essential function of the Ref Desk. StuRat (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Like this, StuRat?: I'd argue it's in their interest to sell you the most expensive items they can, if on commission: "Never ask the barber if you need a haircut, as the answer will always be yes" . Then you wonder why the community is trying to close this desk down and mentions you in particular. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was directly addressing the reliability of a source, in this case the source of information being a salesperson at a clothing store, having a direct conflict of interest with the customer, in that they want the customer to spend as much as possible, if on commission, and the customer wants to spend as little as possible. Thus, a salesman on commission is never a reliable source for information for the customer. This is the same reason why we discourage people who work at a company from editing the Wikipedia article about them, they would tend to oversell their company and products. (Inserting a funny adage helps keep working on the Ref Desk from becoming the humorless drudgery you seem to want.) StuRat (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This question has nothing to do with improving Wikipedia. It is a classic WP:NOTAWEBHOST case and violates the idea we are not a forum. I’ve just closed several threads, one started by StuRat, that are equally inappropriate. Legacypac (talk) 09:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You've made a fundamental mistake in thinking the purpose of the Ref Desk is SOLELY to improve Wikipedia articles. It does have that purpose, among others, including connecting people to references both inside and outside Wikipedia, and providing useful answers to them. StuRat (talk) 15:38, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
