Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2013 April 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Miscellaneous desk
< April 10 << Mar | April | May >> April 12 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


April 11

[edit]

Killing of Travis Alexander

[edit]

Does it seem like the trial in Killing of Travis Alexander is going on much longer than it should? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 17:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem to be dragging on. But have they run out of witnesses yet? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots17:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't really any set time as to how long trials last. While the average length of a jury trial is only five days [1], media circus trials can last as almost two years (see Pizza Connection Trial). Oj Simpson's trial lasted nearly 10 months. As long as there is still a case to present, the prosection isn't going to rest. Livewireo (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think they could present their case a lot quicker. And I think they would have, if all of it wasn't on CNN HLN. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 19:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have to work during the day, so I can't watch HLN. I have to catch the authoritative executive summary, on Inside Edition and the like. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots20:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OP, this question is asking for opinions and inviting debate. Who decides how long a trial "should" take? Who knows how anything "seems" to random strangers? Where would anyone possibly find a reference for these things? Nowhere, that's where. You've made your point that you think "they could present their case a lot quicker". Do you think they'd suddenly cut the trial short once they read your opinion here? Hardly. You've been using this service long enough to know that making self-righteous but futile points is an abuse of this service. -- Jack of Oz [Talk] 21:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Today (on Inside Edition, of course) I saw a clip of famous attorney Mark Geragos saying that because it's a death penalty case, they're trying to make sure they get everything right. Also, the jurors are allowed to ask questions of their own, and they had well over a hundred questions for the accused. So it's taking more time than it might. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots00:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]