Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2012 January 29
| Miscellaneous desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < January 28 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 30 > |
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
January 29
[edit]Blogs
[edit]Hi there, As a new contributor not able to negotiate all the links, it is much easier for me to ask a direct question. Already have a 'static blog' on Word press which I add to as material becomes available. Any readers may make comments but I'm not in a position to answer them, nor do I seek to have the blog edited. Comments are invited and if they show that the observations need editing, then I will do so. Would this type of blog be suitable to export to Wikipedia, and would be in a format that I could continually add to, and edit myself? Hamish84Hamish84 (talk) 05:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- No, it would not be suitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia only allows content that has been sourced to reliable second and third party references. We do not allow original research. Dismas|(talk) 05:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)