Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2023 November 14
Appearance
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 13 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 15 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
November 14
[edit]Spinoza's ethics, mathematically analyzed
[edit]Is there an attempt to examine Spinoza's ethics mathematically, using the tools of modern mathematics? 2A02:8071:60A0:92E0:785D:C373:7F90:3E99 (talk) 12:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- There is a six-page paper on the Academia.edu website by Florian Marion, entitled "A Mathematical Interpretation of Spinoza's Ethics: Short preliminary remarks".[1] If you don't have access to Academia, you can ask the author to email you the paper; his email address is on his university webpage. Not necessarily related to ethics, but possibly of interest:
- J. Friedman, "Some Set-Theoretical Partition Theorems Suggest by the Structure of Spinoza's God", Synthese, 27–1, 1974, p. 199–209.
- R. Ariew, "The Infinite in Spinoza's Philosophy", in P.-F. Moreau (ed.), Spinoza. Issues and Directions. The Proceedings of the Chicago Spinoza Conference, Brill, 1990, p. 16–31.
- P. Bussotti, Ch. Tapp, "The influence of Spinoza's concept of infinity on Cantor's set theory", in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 40 (1), 2009, p. 25–35.
- --Lambiam 18:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wow, mathematisized ethics! I wonder if it can calculate how many people need to be on the other track to switch in the trolley problem ;-) NadVolum (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Notation of representations
[edit]In the article on the Schur-Weyl duality, why are and used for, I think, the sign representation and the trivial representation respectively. I'm not so familiar with the topic and I don't find these symbols used this way in related articles. I suppose just "multiplies away" the sign in this case, but wouldn't something like be the standard notation for the trivial representation? Icek~enwiki (talk) 21:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure they're referring to the symmetric algebra and exterior algebra, with the superscript 2 meaning the second component of these graded algebras. The space of 2-tensors has dimension n2. This breaks up into the symmetric part with dimension (n2+n)/2 and the antisymmetric part with dimension (n2-n)/2. Here, the symmetric part is generated by tensors of the form u⊗v+v⊗u and the antisymmetric part is generated by tensors of the form u⊗v-v⊗u. Note that when k=n the representation given by is simply the determinant. --RDBury (talk) 22:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)