Mathematics desk
< September 14	<< Aug \| September \| Oct >>	Current desk >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

September 15

matrix equivalence

Hi,

Why can we say that the two following matrices :

{\begin{pmatrix}{\overrightarrow {y}}_{1}\\\vdots \\{\overrightarrow {u}}\vdots \\{\overrightarrow {n}}x\end{pmatrix}}={\begin{pmatrix}{\overrightarrow {1}}&x_{{\overrightarrow {1}},1}&\ddots &x_{800,p}\\\ddots &\vdots &\vdots &\cdots \\1&x_{n,1}&{\overrightarrow {5}}\end{pmatrix}}::

are equivalent matrices? 87.88.174.86 (talk) 02:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you find this symbolic matrix equality? It uses strange notations that do not make sense to me. Whatever they may mean, given two matrices

A

and

B

of the same shape, one may assume they are equal (as an assumption in a proof), one may require them to be equal (as something that is given in a subsequent proof), or one may (hope to) prove they are equal.

A=B

then means the same as

A_{i,j}=B_{i,j}

for all corresponding matrix entries. I would need to see the context to understand why the author used the term "equivalent" instead of the simpler "equal". --Lambiam 03:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]