Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2022 January 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< January 20 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 22 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


January 21

[edit]

Where do 2/P in Fourier coefficients come from?

[edit]

 Resolved

Equantions for Fourier coefficients are

(1)
(2)

I cannot figure out the equations above because of the occurrence of . I guess comes from the norm being used for normalizing basis functions and . Accroding to this, if I understand correctly, the inner product of with itself is

(3)

where . Therefore

(4)

The normalized basis functions are

(5)

So the Fourier coefficients I get should be like the scalar projection of onto orthonormal basis in (5)

(6)

Unluckily, (6) is different from (1). Any idea? - Justin545 (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not defined symmetrically. So
Ruslik_Zero 20:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't get it. Could you provide further explanation? - Justin545 (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The basis for Fourier analysis of a periodic function is given by the following orthogonality properties of the sine and cosine functions. Let and be positive integers. Then
For the sake of simplicity, let us fix the period as . Let function be given by
Let us also assume the infinite summations converge. Now consider what happens if we multiply by , , and integrate over the period:
(For the last step, split the summation into the cases and and apply the orthogonality formulas.) So, to find the value of , we need to divide to result of the integral by , that is, half the period. For we have the same story, except that we multiply by  --Lambiam 07:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys, in particular Lambiam. The answer for is understandable and crystal clear. I may try to figure out the term of and ask for help if I'm stuck again. - Justin545 (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For , just integrate without multiplier – which is equivalent to multiplying it by  --Lambiam 14:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]