Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2021 June 23
Appearance
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< June 22 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 24 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
June 23
[edit]Normal number to the base 2?
[edit]Beside the absoluty Normal Number, is there a normal number with base 2. So a binary normal number with 0,010101.. and so on.--2.200.60.148 (talk) 10:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Why did you write the decimal point as a comma?? Georgia guy (talk) 10:52, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Cause I'm German and there, its the usual notation. Sorry for that! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.200.60.148 (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- The construction given for the Champernowne constant works for all bases. See also OEIS sequence A066716 and Weisstein, Eric W. "Binary Champernowne Constant". MathWorld.. --Lambiam 12:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Almost every real is normal in base 2.--Antendren (talk) 23:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also, 0.010101.. and so on (1⁄3 in base 2) is definitely not normal: the sequence "11" does not occur. --Lambiam 10:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- In this cause, the Champernowne constant would be a absolut normal number. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.10.4.26 (talk) 14:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- (a) The Champernowne constant for which base? (For base 2, it equals 0.862240..., and for base 3, it equals 0.598958..., so the base makes a difference.) (b) How do you know (aka [citation needed])? --Lambiam 14:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- In this cause, the Champernowne constant would be a absolut normal number. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.10.4.26 (talk) 14:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also, 0.010101.. and so on (1⁄3 in base 2) is definitely not normal: the sequence "11" does not occur. --Lambiam 10:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)