Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2018 March 19
Appearance
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< March 18 | << Feb | March | Apr >> | Current desk > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
March 19
[edit]Divisibility lattice
[edit]Is the lattice a Heyting algebra? Is the dual lattice a Heyting algebra? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- No and no, because neither has a good negation. The negation must satisfy for every that , that the only element disjoint from is 0, and that (here 0 refers to the 0 of the lattice, which is the number 1 for the divisibility lattice and the number 0 for the dual).
- In the divisibility lattice, being disjoint is equivalent to being coprime. For an intermediate , if (the lattice 1, which is the number 0), then the first requirement fails, and if then the second fails because of the infinitude of primes.
- In the dual lattice, no two nonzero elements are disjoint, again because of the infinitude of primes. So to meet the first requirement, we would need for all nonzero . But then since join is g.c.d., it follows that . But it's easy to see that this operation doesn't satisfy the definition of a Heyting algebra.--129.74.238.54 (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2018 (UTC)