Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2016 August 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< August 7 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 9 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


August 8

[edit]

b^a=ab ?

[edit]

and . Are there other examples where is written in decimal notation? Bo Jacoby (talk) 14:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]

  • My brute-force script says no for . That is not an elegant solution, but it seems easy to prove that there is no such pair of integers for a>1 and b sufficiently large (the number of digits alone will not match), and the a=0,1 cases are trivial to do. TigraanClick here to contact me 15:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you allow different bases then you get a number of other examples, such as 33 = 33 (base 8), 43=34 (base 20). You get a solution for a=2 exactly when the base is a triangular number (such as 10). From sketching the graph it appears that there are only a finite number of solutions for a given base, assuming a and b are non negative integers. If you allow negative integers then ba=10a+b also has the solution b=-4, a=2. --RDBury (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]