Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2015 September 30
Appearance
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< September 29 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | Current desk > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
September 30
[edit]Curve fitting
[edit]I need an approximation formula for a family of functions that I cannot evaluate easily. Each function has these properties:
- , as
- has a single maximum, at (the value of varies among the functions in the family)
- between 0 and , is concave (aka concave downward) (Edited: This is not exactly true: has a small region of convexity where , for some small value of . It's OK if this is ignored.)
- between and , is initially concave, then convex
Except for property 4, the graph of bears a superficial resemblance to that of a Poisson distribution.
What function families might provide a good basis for an approximation formula? Thanks. --134.242.92.2 (talk) 14:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- , for . . -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 17:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure your expression actually gives . Dragons flight (talk) 08:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- You're right of course, fixed. That's what happens when I try to use different notation in my calculations and the writeup... -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 12:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure your expression actually gives . Dragons flight (talk) 08:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Just to make sure I understand the description, does the graph look something like this ?
^ | o | o o | o o |o o o------------------------->
- StuRat (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Qualitatively, yes, but I'd add that graphs of the functions are markedly skewed to the left.--134.242.92.2 (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Maxwell distribution. 120.145.34.119 (talk) 05:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- This doesn't start out downward convex. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- On closer examination, I found that actually has a small region of convexity in for some small . This is kind of subtle and it's OK if it is ignored. --134.242.92.2 (talk) 22:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- In this case, b can be slightly higher than 1 in my function above. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- If you want more parameters, you can use something like . In particular, the quadratic term in the exponent (which also exists in the Maxwell distribution pdf) allows for a steeper decline once the maximum is reached. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 13:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- On closer examination, I found that actually has a small region of convexity in for some small . This is kind of subtle and it's OK if it is ignored. --134.242.92.2 (talk) 22:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- This doesn't start out downward convex. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Maxwell distribution. 120.145.34.119 (talk) 05:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Qualitatively, yes, but I'd add that graphs of the functions are markedly skewed to the left.--134.242.92.2 (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)