Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2014 March 28
Appearance
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< March 27 | << Feb | March | Apr >> | Current desk > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
March 28
[edit]1 x 1011
[edit]I found the number "1 x 1011" ; my question is, how is it different from "1011" and "1.0 x 1011" ?
- I think 1011 is the exact number 100,000,000,000.
- I'm sure that 1.0 x 1011 indicates more significant figures than 1 x 1011. 1.0 x 1011 has an uncertainty of 0.05 x 1011, it is between 95 billion and 105 billion.
- 1 x 1011 is between 95 billion (closer to 100,000,000,000 than to 9 x 1010 = 90,000,000,000) and 150 billion (closer to 100,000,000,000 than 2 x 1011 = 200,000,000,000).
Is that usage/interpretation, esp. the latter, correct? - ¡Ouch! (hurt me / more pain) 07:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- This all seems consistent with Significant_digits#Scientific_notation. But really, this stuff can be context dependent, and there may be different customs of notation used by different authors. If we cant to be clear, we can always just use explicit plus or minus symbols, e.g. , rather than writing out to make use of a convention. SemanticMantis (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- The bands on either side due to limited precision are usually symmetrical, so on that basis 1 x 1011 would be between 50 billion and 150 billion.→86.173.216.149 (talk) 19:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)