Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2012 January 9
Appearance
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< January 8 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | Current desk > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
January 9
[edit]series acceleration
[edit]hello. What is the best form of series acceleration to apply to the (real-valued) Taylor series for e^x (which already converges pretty fast, but hey)? I had a glance at your series acceleration article but it doesn't seem to say which is best used when. This is preferably something that it is easy to write a computer program for. Thanks. 24.92.85.35 (talk) 22:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think there are many specific rules since it depends on factors independent of the specific series. For example if you're only doing a few values to a relatively low accuracy and the series converges reasonably quickly then it may be simpler just to go with the original series. Otherwise it's generally a tradeoff between accuracy, speed of convergence and how complex of an algorithm you're willing to program. The series for ex already converges pretty rapidly unless x is large, and there are simple identities you can apply to reduce to the case where x is within given bounds. Instead of trying to accelerate the series it might be better to use a different method such as continued fractions to get more accuracy, but in many cases adding a few more terms to the series is just as effective.--RDBury (talk) 14:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)