Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2012 April 21
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 20 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 22 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
April 21
[edit]Integration - Calculus
[edit]As part of an assignment, I've derived this expression (dx/dt=-0.0004286x) by following my course notes. Now I'm meant to rearrange and integrate to show that it takes 1.49hours for x to go from 0.2 to 0.02. The coefficient -0.0004286 was arrived at using time in units of seconds. The notes said to remember that ʃdx/d=ln x. I haven't done calc for years, so I'd appreciate a little bit more help than that just to get me started. 203.27.72.5 (talk) 07:58, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- See separation of variables. Widener (talk) 10:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think the notes would have said Widener (talk) 10:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- No, they definitely leave out the "+ C". Maybe my lecturer is no better at calc than I am :P. 203.27.72.5 (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe they said then. Widener (talk) 06:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- No, they definitely leave out the "+ C". Maybe my lecturer is no better at calc than I am :P. 203.27.72.5 (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Ok, I read the article on separation of variables. I followed it as best I could and I think I'm still wrong. Here's what I did:
If that's wrong, what am I doing wrong? If it's right, how do I use that to show that it takes 1.49 hours for x to go from 0.2 to 0.02? 203.27.72.5 (talk) 21:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, wait...it is right and I worked the rest out for myself! Thanks so much for your pointers! 203.27.72.5 (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
~ Need Solid Judgement On Mathematical Tools ~ [NOT SOLVED]
[edit]Which of these is the best in this category of Mathematical Tools? The best would have
- comprehensive range of tools
- good usability of website, and UI of tools that anyone are able to use them
Calculators
- stattrek.com/online-calculator/
- easycalculation.com/
- wessa.net/
- vassarstats.net/
- alcula.com/calculators
- danielsoper.com/statcalc3/default.aspx
Feel free to suggest the best single math tools site if you already know from experience.
Test example:
If c = a/b
but you do not know a
The calculator will output a. Does this with c and b being unknown also. Same formula.
Thingstofollow (talk) 11:08, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- There is likely to be no "best single math tools site"- it'll depend on what exactly you want to do. I use http://www.wolframalpha.com. Try it on your example: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=c%3Da%2Fb and I think it does what you want. (a=bc) Staecker (talk) 12:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- -.001 our of 5 star answer. There's not even a tool on there to easily do correlation. It's like you didn't even read. Thingstofollow (talk) 20:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Matrix Decompsotion
[edit]I wish to decompose the matrix into some product of the matrices and , as well as their respective inverses. How might I go about this? Hints preferable to answers. Thanks. meromorphic [talk to me] 16:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
On second thoughts, I think we need -I in there as well, else the negative determinant cannot be achieved. meromorphic [talk to me] 19:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)- I don't think this question has an affirmative answer given that the determinant of my matrix is negative and the determinant of the other two is positive. Thanks anyway. meromorphic [talk to me] 19:58, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Most popular math (grades 1-9) materials?
[edit]What math textbooks/ebooks/instructional tools, for grades 1-9, are the most popular or common being used in classrooms today? --Agentundertables (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- The ones in China or India I'd guess ;-) Dmcq (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2012 (UTC)